Is Bill Clinton Detrimental to Hillary’s Campaign?

Is Bill Clinton Detrimental to Hillary’s Campaign?

With the recent Rants from former president Clinton on the Nevada

Caucus’s, Calling Obama’s history of opposition to the war, and his

television interviews, Bill Clinton may be causing Hilliary’s

supporter to look toward the Obama Campaign due to the positive

message of hope.  President Clinton appears to be taking his

speech opportunities to re-write his administrative and moral

blunders while president rather than focusing on His wifes campaign.

Hillary Won the Nevada Caucus’s but, President Clinton called the

process, won by Senator Clinton, disenfranchising to many people in

the state.  Some pundits and advisors are suggesting, president

should keep his mouth closed and let Hilliary run the campaign.

 

Bill

Clinton’s poll ratings are very high so Hillary figures he can be of

great help to her on the campaign trail. So far, so good — but then

they extrapolate that view and conclude that he would be a good person

to make her negative attacks on opponents, to answer charges against

her and to take the media to task for their coverage. And that’s where

they are wrong.

Bill’s high ratings are largely due to his nonpolitical activities

in recent years. His book Giving, although largely a payoff to those

who have given to him or to his wife’s campaign, portrays him as a

philanthropist par excellence. Combined with the kudos for his role in

helping tsunami and Katrina victims, and his annual September

conference to organize and help to third world countries, he is

acquiring the statesmanlike reputation that eluded him when he was a

working politician.

But when he gets down and dirty, defending his own record, rebutting

attacks on Hillary or excoriating the media or his wife’s opponents, he

acts very political and brings down the very ratings that made his

intervention seem useful in the first place.

He and I spoke right before the 1994 Congressional elections about

where he could campaign to help to re-elect Democrats. He had just

returned from the signing of the peace accord between Jordan and Israel

and his approval ratings, for once, were pretty high. “You should go

back to the Middle East,” I told him.

“But you don’t understand, my ratings are high now because of the

trip to the Middle East and I can do candidates a lot of good,” he

answered.

“No, you’ll lower your ratings because you won’t appear presidential

as you campaign and you’ll end up doing the candidates for whom you

campaign more harm than good,” I replied.

Bill couldn’t help himself. He ran out and campaigned all over the

U.S. for the congressmen and senators who had backed his economic

package and anti-crime bill, and most of them ended up losing in the

GOP sweep of 1994. In the meantime, he lowered his rating by 10 points

by campaigning and seeming political.

When Bill takes the stump for Hillary and speaks in bland

generalities, he does her some good and no harm. But when he emerges as

a cut and burn politician, flipping and flopping over his past position

on Iraq and attacking media coverage of Hillary, he lowers his ratings

and ends his usefulness to Hillary’s campaign.

The best thing for Bill to do is to stay home. Or better yet, leave

the country on some charitable or philanthropic mission while his wife

runs for president. His job is to keep his own ratings high. Her job is

to exploit those ratings for her own advantage, no matter how little

she deserves them.

Hillary’s entire campaign, like her whole legal and political

career, is entirely derivative of Bill’s. By using her lynchpin as a

bludgeon to hammer her opponents, he destroys his effectiveness and

hurts her own campaign.

Source: foxnews.com via politisite

Even the Bloggers on Time and RCP are seeing the writing on the wall 

Back Off, Bubba!

Posted by TOM BEVAN 

Jon Alter has some scoop:

Prominent Democrats are upset with the aggressive role that Bill

Clinton is playing in the 2008 campaign, a role they believe is

inappropriate for a former president and the titular head of the

Democratic Party. In recent weeks, Sen. Edward Kennedy and Rep. Rahm

Emanuel, both currently neutral in the Democratic contest, have told

their old friend heatedly on the phone that he needs to change his tone

and stop attacking Sen. Barack Obama, according to two sources familiar

with the conversations who asked for anonymity because of their

sensitive nature. [snip]

“This is excruciating,” says a member of the Clintons’ circle, who

asked for anonymity. “But the stakes couldn’t be higher. It’s worth it

to tarnish himself a bit now to win the presidency.”

Why does that last quote not surprise me?

On primary day in New Hampshire a couple of weeks ago, I wondered how this fight would shake out:

How ironic is it that Bill Clinton – once dubbed America’s first

black president – is now in the position, along with his wife, of

having to go negative against a black man who appears to have the first

legitimate chance of winning the White House? If the Clintons are

successful in snuffing out Obama’s insurgency with swift boat like

tactics, how much venom and hatred will that unleash against them by

progressive activists and the African-American community – and how

might that play a role in the general election?

Bill may indeed back off, now that his wife has regained the upper

hand with a win yesterday and the Democratic race shifts to South

Carolina. If Obama wins convincingly there, however, don’t be surprised

to see Bill back on the attack heading into February 5th.

Source: time-blog.com via politisite

Bill Clinton Nevada Law Suit Bill Clinton's Chris Wallace Interview Bill Clinton on Obama: Big Fairy Tale

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | |

Be the first to comment

Comment on Politisite Story