Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor lied to Judicial Committee on Second Amendment

When Supreme court nominee Sotomayor said that the Second Amendment as an individual right was settled law, she did one of two things:  She lied to the Senate Judicial committee or changed her mind.  We think the former as she told Sen. Mark Udall, she considered the 2008 ruling that struck down a Washington, D.C., gun ban as settled law”
In her first action at a second amendment case, Sotomayor and others wrote the opposition opinion on the second amendment as an  “individual Right”  saying that hand gun ownership was not an “individual right”.  Settled law appears to be unsettling to Sotomayor.
What bothers this writer is that we have another Supreme Court Nominee, Kagan, who is testifying before the Judicial committee saying that Handgun ownership as an  individual right is settled law.
Here is a real legal opinion:

Perhaps the most startling aspect of the Supreme Court opinions in McDonald v. Chicago was the dissenters’ assault on District of Columbia v. Heller. Not only did Justice Stephen G. Breyer vote against extending the Second Amendment to state and local governments, he also argued forcefully and at length for overturning Heller and, therefore, for turning the Second Amendment into a practical nullity. Ominously, Justice Sonia Sotomayor joined the Breyer dissent – contradicting what she told the U.S. Senate and the American people last summer.
Regarding the key issue in McDonald – whether the 14th Amendment makes the Second Amendment enforceable against state and local governments – Justice Sotomayor resolutely refused to tell the senators how she might vote. So in voting against incorporating the Second Amendment, Justice Sotomayor was not inconsistent with what she had told the Senate. But regarding Heller, her actions as a justice broke her promises from last summer.
The Breyer-Sotomayor-Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissent urged that Heller be overruled and declared, “In sum, the Framers did not write the Second Amendment in order to protect a private right of armed self defense.”
Contrast that with her Senate testimony: “I understand the individual right fully that the Supreme Court recognized in Heller.” And, “I understand how important the right to bear arms is to many, many Americans.”
Yet her McDonald opinion shows her “understanding” that those many, many Americans are completely wrong to think they have a meaningful individual right.
To the Senate Judiciary Committee, Justice Sotomayor repeatedly averred that Heller is “settled law.” The Associated Press reported that Sen. Mark Udall, Colorado Democrat, “said Sotomayor told him during a private meeting that she considers the 2008 ruling that struck down a Washington, D.C., handgun ban as settled law that would guide her decisions in future cases.”
So by “settled,” she apparently meant “not settled; should be overturned immediately.”
In the McDonald case, the Breyer-Sotomayor-Ginsburg dissent recapitulated various arguments that had been made in Heller by the dissenting justices. The dissenters also said Heller should be overturned because some law-review articles had criticized Heller. If criticism by a handful of law-review articles were the criterion for overturning a precedent, almost every major Supreme Court precedent would be overruled.
Besides, there also are plenty of law-journal articles that praise Heller and point out serious logical and historical errors that the anti-Second Amendment dissenters made in Heller.
Another argument that Breyer-Sotomayor-Ginsburg made for getting rid of Heller pointed to a McDonald amicus brief by some legal historians. That brief discussed the 1689 English Declaration of Rights, which was enacted by Parliament after the despotic Stuart monarchs were ousted in the Glorious Revolution. The Declaration guaranteed “[t]hat the subjects which are Protestants may have arms for their defence suitable to their conditions and as allowed by law.” This guarantee was an ancestor of the Second Amendment.
via Sotomayor lied –

Related Stories:
Justice’s dissent contradicts confirmation testimony
Sonia Sotomayor and the Second Amendment
Voters Must Hold Democrats Accountable for Sotomayor’s Lies During Confirmation

2 Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. Tweets that mention Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor lied to Judicial Committee on Second Amendment | Politisite --
  2. It’s the end of the world as we know it…if gun grabbers have their way | Bullets First

Comments are closed.