Christine O'Donnell and the Tea Party Era

Mark J. Fitzgibbons at American thinker had this to say

Christine O’Donnell is a game-changer in the first regularly scheduled federal elections of the Tea Party era in more ways than one.
The evidence? Read the reactions of three people from various parts of the political-media establishment: Peggy NoonTan (“Why It’s Time for the Tea Party“), Chris Matthews (“Chris Matthews Bets Lib Guest Christine O’Donnell Wins in November“) and A.B. Stoddard of The Hill (“Tea Party’s Already Won“).
“Experts” said Ms. O’Donnell couldn’t win in the Delaware Republican primary, and many now say she can’t win the general election. They have hoped that about all the Tea Party era candidates, but the vicious attacks on O’Donnell — especially those coming from establishment Republicans — demonstrate that the “smartest people in the room” have failed to grasp what the Tea Party knows is at stake.
The O’Donnell win is like my favorite line from the movie The Fugitive. U.S. Marshall Tommy Lee Jones has fugitive Harrison Ford cornered. Ford says, “I didn’t kill my wife.” Jones replies, “I don’t care.”
His job wasn’t to sort that out on the spot. His job was to bring in the fugitive. Sometimes justice gets sorted out later.
The Tea Party has an urgent mission. Justice will be sorted out. Noonan, Matthews, and Stoddard are at least beginning to grasp what is happening. Others — professional political consultants, the political media, the political class, indeed, all who have a vested interest in big government — are in denial.
Karl Rove defended his self-ruinous election eve attack of O’Donnell on Fox News’ Hannity show by claiming he’s not a cheerleader for every Republican candidate.
Funny, prior to Tuesday night, that’s exactly what he was. He was also the cheerleader for policies that ended the Republican congressional majority and is as responsible as anyone for bringing about that “Hope and Change” thing. If he was the “Architect,” the people rejected his blueprint.
The media’s foremost elitist “common man,” Bill O’Reilly, defended his friend and Fox News colleague Rove: he opened his show Thursday by reiterating Rove’s “concerns” that O’Donnell isn’t what they think the ideal candidate should be.
O’Reilly was more genteel and tepid in his description of O’Donnell’s opponent in the general election, a once-self-described Marxist, referring to him as perhaps a “socialist.” O’Reilly said the Delaware general election pits extreme ideology against extreme ideology.
Bill, let me break it to you. One ideology is against freedom and is a proven failure.

via American Thinker: Christine O’Donnell and the Tea Party Era.

Be the first to comment

Comment on Politisite Story