Obama to delay Keystone XL until after 2012 election

In yet another large, symbolic show of stock celebrities and lively characters, tens of thousands of hand-holding protesters encircled the White House Sunday to express opposition to a proposed transnational oil pipeline. The gathering aimed to demonstrate to President Barack Obama that he has all the support he needs to reject a permit for the Keystone XL, which would flow south from the oil sands of Canada to the refineries of the Texas Gulf Coast — and, along the way, protesters say, potentially threaten the clean water supply of America’s heartland.

But the presence of thousands of people outside his house seems to have reminded the president of the opposite — of all the support he stands to lose if he approves the project that backers say will create jobs and reduce the nation’s dependence on the oil of unsavory nations like Saudi Arabia.

In many ways, Keystone XL is the ultimate contest between special interest groups. In one corner, the unlikely combination of TransCanada, the company behind the pipeline, and various unions that support the project because of the jobs it will create. In the other, environmentalists who fear an “inevitable” pipeline spill someday down the road.

The Obama campaign can’t afford to lose the support of either side. So, in typical slippery fashion, the administration seeks simply to delay a decision. The Los Angeles Times reports:

The Obama administration is considering a move that could delay a decision on the controversial Keystone XL pipeline by requiring sponsors to reduce the project’s environmental risks before it can be approved, according to people with knowledge of the deliberations.

The step might put off a decision until after the 2012 election and be a way for the White House to at least temporarily avoid antagonizing either the unions that support the pipeline or the environmental activists who oppose it as President Obama gears up for his campaign.

For a president who professes jobs as his No. 1 priority, his willingness to delay this decision is perplexing. The president has said he’s sure those who would benefit from Keystone XL employment wouldn’t want a job to come at the expense of healthy drinking water. That might be. Dispute also exists as to the number of jobs the project will actually create. But, at the very least, if the president considers jobs to be so urgent a matter as his relentless championing of the American Jobs Act suggests, his administration would

via Priorities: State Department might delay decision on Keystone XL until after 2012 election « Hot Air.

Keystone XL Debate Pits Environmentalists Against Unions

On Sunday, thousands of protesters are expected to lock arms outside the White House and try to influence President Obama’s decision on Keystone XL, the proposed, 1,700-mile oil pipeline that would stretch from Alberta, Canada, through U.S. mountain and plains states, to the Texas Gulf Coast.

This week, the president said that while the State Department is reviewing the decision, he alone will make it and no matter the outcome, it will likely divide the president’s base.

Unions are fighting for the pipeline, which they say will provide 20,000 jobs. Environmentalists oppose it because of potential oil spills and the greenhouse gases they say the process would cause.

via Keystone XL Debate Pits Environmentalists Against Unions | Here & Now.

About Albert N. Milliron 6991 Articles
Albert Milliron is the founder of Politisite. Milliron has been credentialed by most major news networks for Presidential debates and major Political Parties for political event coverage. Albert maintains relationships with the White House and State Department to provide direct reporting from the Administration’s Press team. Albert is the former Public Relations Chairman of the Columbia County Republican Party in Georgia. He is a former Delegate. Milliron is a veteran of the US Army Medical Department and worked for Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of Psychiatry.


  1. The pipeline has the highest possible environmental standards of any pipeline at the present running across the United States.  Today the Premier of Alberta, Allison Redford, is in Washington to discuss the issue with members of Congress. 

    Billions have already been invested in this pipeline, which not only would provide a safe source of oil, but would also contribute positively to energy and national security. 

    A President has the obligation to make decisions that are in the best interests of the United States and not to bolster his chances for re-election in 2012. 

    Those that believe that oil just appears, think again, including the environmentalists and celebrities.  I would suggest that they all drive and use plastic products, all requiring oil.   Perhaps they would love it when the cost per gallon goes up to $10 a gallon.  Why?  Look at the situation in Iran.  40% of the world’s oil travels through the Strait of Hormuz.  How easy would it be for Iran to cause a disruption? 

    Mr. President put you ideology aside and do what is right for the United States.  You have already proven that Solyndra and other alternate energy projects have not worked and just wasted tax payers money. 

    The pipeline will also provide the jobs that the President continues to promote with his go nowhere Jobs Act.  Good paying union jobs. 

    Greetings from Alberta, if the United States doesn’t want our oil, China will be happy to take it.  The choice is yours.