50,000 Physicists: Humans off the Hook, The Sun is to Blame for Global Warming

The American Physical Society, consisting of over 50,000 physicists was touted as the group that Al Gore used as the group where the debate over global warming was over. Well the Truth is the APS is reversing it’s view on Climate change and is publicly coming out in dis-belief of Human involvement in Global warning.

 

The group is so sure of their new found truth that they are offering up a publicly held debate on the subject. The group who are the real numbers crunchers and model generators not social activists that that once called global warming unconvertible. Have new data according to APS forum editors, Jeff Marque, “There is a considerable presence within the scientific community of people who do not agree with the IPCC conclusion that anthropogenic CO2 emissions are very probably likely to be primarily responsible for global warming that has occurred since the Industrial Revolution.”

 

[q url=”http://www.dailytech.com/Myth+of+Consensus+Explodes+APS+Opens+Global+Warming+Debate/article12403.htm”]

The APS is opening its debate with the publication of a paper by Lord Monckton of Brenchley, which concludes that climate sensitivity — the rate of temperature change a given amount of greenhouse gas will cause — has been grossly overstated by IPCC modeling.   A low sensitivity implies additional atmospheric CO2 will have little effect on global climate.
Larry Gould, Professor of Physics at the University of Hartford and Chairman of the New England Section of the APS, called Monckton’s paper an “expose of the IPCC that details numerous exaggerations and “extensive errors”
In an email to DailyTech, Monckton says, “I was dismayed to discover that the IPCC’s 2001 and 2007 reports did not devote chapters to the central ‘climate sensitivity’ question, and did not explain in proper, systematic detail the methods by which they evaluated it. When I began to investigate, it seemed that the IPCC was deliberately concealing and obscuring its method.” 
According to Monckton, there is substantial support for his results, “in the peer-reviewed literature, most articles on climate sensitivity conclude, as I have done, that climate sensitivity must be harmlessly low.”
Monckton, who was the science advisor to Britain’s Thatcher administration, says natural variability is the cause of most of the Earth’s recent warming.   “In the past 70 years the Sun was more active than at almost any other time in the past 11,400 years … Mars, Jupiter, Neptune’s largest moon, and Pluto warmed at the same time as Earth.” [/q]
Unless there are industrialized nations on Jupiter or Pluto, Global warming could be called solar system warming and has very little to do with Human emissions.
The Politisite Bottom Line: (Opinion) Al Gore and other scientists while looking at data from the Earth and coming to the conclusion that the earth is on a warming trend. Coming to the conclusion that since industry has caused increased emission is th reason for the earth warming. What the scientists failed to see what due to the suns increased solar activity, other heavenly bodies where effected as well. most of the Planets with our solar system has increased in temperature as well.
Does this mean, stop conserving resources? We say no. We are on a better trend and n matter ones view of Al Gore, we have made our country better by following some of the environmental steps outlined by those who have blamed humans for the natural unfolding of our universe. So keep those energy efficient lights and keep recycling. Just don’t go to therapy for ruining the world for driving your Hummer.

6 Comments

  1. THANK YOU FOR BRINIG UP THE 50,000 PHYSICISTS THAT VOICED CONCERN ON CLIMATE CHANGE.
    FOR THE PAST 3 YEARS I HAVE TRIED SO HARD TO MAKE SOME ONE LISTEN. PLEASE SEE MY ARTICLE ON GLOBAL WARMING.
    NOW IS CALLED CLIMATE CHANGE
    Submitted by ANGELOS BACKUS
    IT SEEMS THAT MY ARTICLE ( http://hmsweeny.com/links/GLOBALWARMING.htm ) HAD AN IMPACT, AL GORE AND HIS FRIENDS NO LONGER CALL IT “GLOBAL WARMING”. NOW IS CLIMATE CHANGE!
    I GUESS THEY DO NOT WANT TO BE LABELED AS MORONS

  2. Eco freekos: “Eeek! CO2 is polluting the environment.”
    Gaia worshipers: “Tell that to the biosphere.”
    Biosphere: “More. Yum, yum. Burp.”
    MORE C02 = MORE GREEN
    (good bumper sticker)
    Great article you have posted:)

  3. CO2 is a GHG, plant food and fertilizer. Politicians treat voters like children on the AGW issue by offering the only two options they want us to have: Cap and Trade or Carbon Tax. What about listening to the science? There is no experimental evidence to support CO2 and AGW. Alarmists built the house of cards decades ago. Demand debate and see what the environmental lobby groups say.
    As I understand it, the theory, supported by experiments, of the Danish National Space Center goes as follows: Active sun = enhanced magnetic field = solar wind = geomagnetic shield response = less low-level clouds = less heat reflected = warmer climate.
    Inactive sun = reduced magnetic field = reduced solar wind = geomagnetic shield drops = galactic cosmic ray flux = more low-level clouds and more snow = more heat reflected = colder climate.
    That is how the bulk of climate change might work, modulated by sunspot peak frequency there are cycles of global warming and cooling like waves in the ocean. When the waves are closely spaced, the planets warm; when the waves are spaced farther apart, the planets cool.
    AAAS published the correlation paper in Science in 1991 by Fris-Christiensen and Lassen. They demonstrated a 95% correlation between sunspot peak frequency and warming and cooling. Further correlation failed, likely due to cooling from Pinatubo eruption. Since then Svensmark et al (2006) published experimental support for the cosmic ray (sunspot modulated) hypothesis in the Journal of the Royal Society. Unfortunately all this was missed out by the UN IPCC. Whether this is a political issue or not, the public and media knowledge of the science is incomplete and unbalanced and needs to be brought out into the daylight.
    The Danish National Space Center will be conducting further experiments in the CERN facility shortly. Politicians should know the lay of the land before they devote more money to warming than might be needed for overcoats for the homeless.
    This has been in the literature since 1990s but the the nepotistic NA university community never recognises work by people outside their own church. I don’t think a real debate can be held because the politicians hold the keys to the research grant vault. Objective scientists will be starved out, while the junk derivative pot boilers continue.

  4. Would you people get the story straight. This society opened up DEBATE….I say again…DEBATE on the issue. They did not “declare” global warming a scam. There is a really big difference.

1 Trackback / Pingback

  1. New Report: Humans off the Hook, The Sun is to Blame for Global Warming « POLITISITE: Politics from the RIGHT Side of the WEB

Comment on Politisite Story