Justice Department Sues Arizona for doing their Job, Suit says nothing about Discrimination

As widely anticipated, Attorney General Eric Holder today filed a lawsuit against Arizona and Gov. Jan Brewer over the state’s immigration law. The suit seeks a preliminary injunction to stop the law from being implemented.

The court filing states that Arizona law is pre-empted by federal law and therefore violates the supremacy clause of the U.S. Constitution.
The filing makes no assertion that the law is discriminatory or risks being applied in a discriminatory fashion, as the president and other officials said they feared would be the case. Interestingly, this suit makes no civil rights charges against the Arizona law.
You can read the complaint HERE and the preliminary injunction brief HERE.
“The State of Arizona has crossed this constitutional line,” write Assistant Attorney General Tony West, United States Attorney Dennis K. Burke and others. “In acknowledged disagreement with the manner in which the federal government has regulated immigration and in contravention of these constitutional principles…The states are not permitted to set their own independent immigration policies, with varying and potentially conflicting enforcement systems and priorities. Were a number of states to act as Arizona has and strike out on their own, federal immigration policy and enforcement efforts would be crippled.”
The suit states that the Arizona law pursues only the goal of “attrition” while ignoring other objectives Congress has established for the federal immigration system.
You can read more about the lawsuit in THIS PIECE by Senior Justice Correspondent Pierre Thomas.
-Jake Tapper
via Justice Department Sues Arizona for Immigration Law — But Does Not Make Charges of “Discrimination” – Political Punch.

3 Comments

  1. “The suit states that the Arizona law pursues only the goal of “attrition” while ignoring other objectives Congress has established for the federal immigration system.”
    This would be a valid argument had Congress actually established realistic “objectives” that addressed the core of this problem. Our elected officials have preened, posed and postured for the cameras, but, in reality, they have only dodged and delayed and otherwise done everything in their power to avoid providing the states in particular and the country as a whole with a cohesive approach to the immigration issue, which is exactly why Arizona took this step in the first place.
    The immigration issue is but one of many shining examples of how Congress has little to no interest in actually representing the people and has no real intention addressing this country’s needs. This lawsuit is mere icing on the cake.

  2. “The suit states that the Arizona law pursues only the goal of “attrition” while ignoring other objectives Congress has established for the federal immigration system.”
    This would be a valid argument had Congress actually established realistic “objectives” that addressed the core of this problem. Our elected officials have preened, posed and postured for the cameras, but, in reality, they have only dodged and delayed and otherwise done everything in their power to avoid providing the states in particular and the country as a whole with a cohesive approach to the immigration issue, which is exactly why Arizona took this step in the first place.
    The immigration issue is but one of many shining examples of how Congress has little to no interest in actually representing the people and has no real intention addressing this country’s needs. This lawsuit is mere icing on the cake.

4 Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. World Wide News Flash
  2. World Wide News Flash
  3. Tweets that mention Justice Department Sues Arizona for doing their Job, Suit says nothing about Discrimination | Politisite -- Topsy.com
  4. Tweets that mention Justice Department Sues Arizona for doing their Job, Suit says nothing about Discrimination | Politisite -- Topsy.com

Comment on Politisite Story